Hvert 3. år skal alle EU-lande aflevere et nationalt program (NaPro) til EU-Kommissionen (Generaldirektoratet for Energi) vedr. ansvarlig og sikker håndtering af brugt nukleart brændsel og radioaktivt affald.
I indberetningen skal
- den nationale infrastruktur og det nationale program for affaldshåndtering præsenteres og
- det skal beskrives, hvordan den nationale politik føres ud i livet.
EU-landenes nationale kerneaffalds-programmer (NaPro) kan ses på
Enerwebwatch.eu Og Kommissionens rapporter om medlemslandenes nationale rapporter kan også ses der. (1)
Danmarks 1. rapport og nationale kerneaffalds-program
- Council directive 2011/70/euratom for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste – first report from Denmark
- National politik og program for ansvarlig og sikker håndtering af nukleart brændsel og radioaktivt affald i Danmark
Den 13.6.2016 takkede EU-Kommissionen for modtagelsen af Danmarks 1. rapport og NaPro og bad samtidig Danmark besvare en række spørgsmål for at kunne vurdere den danske NaPro. Gerne så hurtigt som muligt, og senest den 13.12.2016.
5 1/2 måned efter fristen, 30.5.2017, blev Danmarks svar oversendt til EU-Kommissionen via EU-Repræsentationen i Bryssel. Jeg kender datoen, fordi jeg tilfældigt samme dag bad om aktindsigt hos EU-Repræsentationen vedr. Danmarks svar.
Sundhedsstyrelsen har dd. lagt Kommissionens spørgsmål og Sundhedsministeriets svar online på sis.dk
Bemærk, at der hverken står dato på Danmarks svar til Kommissionen, ejheller reference-, journal- og dokumentnummer. Til sammenligning vises Sveriges svar nedenfor.
Kommissionen sendte sine spørgsmål til Sverige vedr. den svenske NaPro 8.8.16, og Sverige svarede hurtigt, som Kommissionen opfordrede til. Svaret blev fremsendt 3.11.2016.
Kommissionens spørgsmål til Danmarks nationale politik og program for håndtering af brugt nukleart brændsel og radioaktivt affald
- nyttige oplysninger om praksis og fremtidige planer for håndtering af brugt nukleart brændsel og radioaktivt affald og
- der er en udmærket behandling af de vigtigste oplyninger der kræves i direktivet.
Men - der er behov for yderligere afklaring på følgende områder
- politik
- status for det nationale program (NaPro)
- langsigtede planer og mål i NaPro
- procedurer for revision og ajourføring af NaPro
- omkostningsvurdering og financieringsordninger for programmets gennemførelse
- forsknings- udviklings- og demonstrationsaktiviteter
- de vigtigste resultatindikatorer
- affaldsklassificering
- strategier for perioden efter lukning samt
- metoder der skal anvendes for at bevare viden.
Når man læser svarene fra Sundhedsstyrelsen til EU-Kommissionen, kan det undre, hvorfor det har taget så lang tid at give så mangelfulde svar.
Flere af de spørgsmål, Kommissionen stiller, har bl.a. de 5 borgergrupper, Atom Posten og Noah forgæves spurgt til i årevis.
Udover Kommissionens 10 ovennævnte punkter er der fortsat ingen plan for NORM affaldet (Natural Occuring Radioactive Material), som der pt er 450 tons af fra olie- og gasboringer i Nordsøen. Desuden er der 1100m3 urantailings og forurenet beton samt 3760 tons uranmalm fra Kvanefjeldet.
Borgerinddragelse, lovet i beslutningsgrundlaget 2008, som vi har måttet vente på i 5 år, spørger Kommissionen også til (8.1). Ved læsning af Danmarks svar (side 9) desangående får man næsten medlidenhed med den stakkels embedsmand, der skal forklare, hvad der sker i "organet", kontaktforum, oprettet 13.5.2016. Resuméer af diskussioner i kontaktforum er bragt videre til tovholderen på slutdepotsagen, den tværministerielle arbejdsgruppe, der i al hemmelighed har udarbejdet en rapport til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren. (Se mere her). Man kan have sin tvivl, om hvor reel borgernes indflydelse har været.
Mht. Kommissionens spørgsmål om selvevalueringer og international peerevaluering, giver Danmark ikke svar om selvevalueringer, men der bliver givet en ny oplysning om, at Danmark har anmodet IAEA (Det Internationale Atomenergiagentur) om at evaluere.
IAEA kan ikke siges at være en uvildig instans. Flere uvildige eksperter er kritiske overfor IAEAs rolle, som f.eks. den hollandske teknologiekspert Jan Willem Storm Van Leuwen, der beskriver IAEA i Mining at Kvanefjeld 22.1.2017 side 41 (Annex B) (2):
"It is a misconception to regard the IAEA as an independent scientific institute, for two reasons:
-
the IAEA, has the promotion of nuclear power in its mission statement,
-
its official publications have to be approved by all member states of the IAEA.
Politicians should be aware of the promotional and political aspects and of biased or incomplete information from the IAEA.
Information on nuclear matters to the public and politicians originates almost exclusively from institutions with vested interests in nuclear power, such as: IAEA, World Nuclear Association (WNA, the official representative of the Western nuclear industry), Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the US. The views of the Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA) rely heavily on the IAEA and the WNA. The IAEA plays a dominant role in the statements of the nuclear world concerning nuclear security and health effects of dispersion of radioactive materials into the human environment."
Skrevet af Anne
Henvisninger
Rådets direktiv 2011/70/Euratom af 19. juli 2011 om fastsættelse af en fællesskabsramme for ansvarlig og sikker håndtering af brugt nukleart brændsel og radioaktivt affald
1/ Rapporter medio maj 2017 fra Enerwebwatch.eu
European Union
European Commission15/05/2017 - Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on progress of implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM and an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects / Rapport de la Commission au Conseil et au Parlement européen sur l'avancement de la mise en oeuvre de la directive 2011/70/Euratom du Conseil, un inventaire des déchets radioactifs et du combustible usé présents sur le territoire de la Communauté et les perspectives futures - COM(2017) 236 final
>> report - rapport - Bericht
European Union
European Commission15/05/2017 - Commission Staff Working Document - Inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on progress of implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM and an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects - SWD(2017) 161 Final
>> report
European Union
European Commission15/05/2017 - Commission Staff Workding Document - Progress of implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM accompanying the document accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on progress of implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM and an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects - SWD(2017) 159 Final
>> report
Background Documents
European Union
Council of the EU02/08/2011 - Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste / Directive 2011/70/Euratom du Conseil du 19 juillet 2011 établissant un cadre communautaire pour la gestion responsable et sûre du combustible usé et des déchets radioactifs
>> english - français - other languages
2/ Den hollandske teknologiekspert Jan Willem Storm Van Leuwen skriver om IAEA i Mining at Kvanefjeld januar 2017 side 41 (Annex B)
Entanglement of interests
Dominance of the IAEA
The International Atomic Energy Agency is an organisation that seeks to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and to inhibit its use for any military purpose, including nuclear weapons. The IAEA was established as an autonomous organization on 29 July 1957. Established independently of the United Nations through its own international treaty, the IAEA Statute [http://www.iaea.org/About/statute.html], the IAEA reports to both the UN General Assembly and Security Council; its total Membership counts 159 states [http://www.iaea.org/ About/Policy/MemberStates/]. Official publications of the IAEA have to be approved by all member states of the IAEA. The globally authoritative status on nuclear matters of the IAEA follows from above mentioned facts.
The IAEA is often called the ‘nuclear watchdog’, due to the frequent publicity regarding surveillance and inspections of nuclear installations in less stable countries which could be used for the production of nuclear weapons. IAEA’s promotional activities are much less visible in the media..
It is a misconception to regard the IAEA as an independent scientific institute, for two reasons:
Dominance of the IAEA
The International Atomic Energy Agency is an organisation that seeks to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and to inhibit its use for any military purpose, including nuclear weapons. The IAEA was established as an autonomous organization on 29 July 1957. Established independently of the United Nations through its own international treaty, the IAEA Statute [http://www.iaea.org/About/statute.html], the IAEA reports to both the UN General Assembly and Security Council; its total Membership counts 159 states [http://www.iaea.org/ About/Policy/MemberStates/]. Official publications of the IAEA have to be approved by all member states of the IAEA. The globally authoritative status on nuclear matters of the IAEA follows from above mentioned facts.
The IAEA is often called the ‘nuclear watchdog’, due to the frequent publicity regarding surveillance and inspections of nuclear installations in less stable countries which could be used for the production of nuclear weapons. IAEA’s promotional activities are much less visible in the media..
It is a misconception to regard the IAEA as an independent scientific institute, for two reasons:
- the IAEA, has the promotion of nuclear power in its mission statement,
- its official publications have to be approved by all member states of the IAEA.Politicians should be aware of the promotional and political aspects and of biased or incomplete information from the IAEA.
Information on nuclear matters to the public and politicians originates almost exclusively from institutions with vested interests in nuclear power, such as: IAEA, World Nuclear Association (WNA, the official representative of the Western nuclear industry), Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the US. The views of the Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA) rely heavily on the IAEA and the WNA. The IAEA plays a dominant role in the statements of the nuclear world concerning nuclear security and health effects of dispersion of radioactive materials into the human environment.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar